Sunday, 27 December 2020

Climate Change ion 2020 Killed More People than COVID

It is easier to talk about the 150 billion lost this year to climate change but what often gets lost is the human cost, it is estimated that 3,500 may have died in the disasters brought on by how we have changed our climate. Yet the displacement of 135 million people likely caused even more deaths. This is only the tip of the iceberg, as the world health organization estimates 4.2 million people meet an early death from the air pollution that is driving climate change. 

While the world is battling COVID, which to date has caused 1.8 million deaths, we are focused less on what is by far a more dangerous enemy. Climate change is still on an upward trajectory and what is most frightening is what we are experiencing today was caused 10 to 20 years ago. There is a time lag between the release of pollution and the impact on our climate. So if we bent the curve today, which is virtually we still have 10 to 20 years of increasingly violent climate change.

While COVID is a real existential problem Climate Change is an even greater threat. What this really means is we are struggling to ensure the survival of the human species, and at the moment we are losing this battle. Our current level of deaths from climate change is the result of what we did last century, not what we have done this century, that impact is yet to come. COVID itself is related to our out of control population, another contributor to Climate Change.

When you hear increases in the building of container ships, airplanes, pipelines, the continued mining of coal and fossil fuel exploration it just seems like suicidal behaviour or madness. Experts tell us that we need to keep 80% of our fossil fuel reserves in the ground, instead, we are continually expanding our dependence and use of fossil fuels. The airline industry in 2018 accounted for 2.4% of our CO2 emissions but by 2050 the industry will grow by 300%, and in addition to the CO2 these planes deposit nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide into the upper atmosphere with even a greater impact on climate change. The shipping industry which burns extremely toxic bunker fuel account for 18-30 percent of the nitrogen oxide and 9% of the sulphur oxides (sulphur creates acid rain). These ships at the moment account for 4% of the carbon dioxide in the air but again this industry is on a steep upward trend. Keep in mind both these industries also have significant impacts on water and ocean pollution.

https://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/greening-transport/41380820.pdf
The facts are Canada and British Columbia are among the worst polluters in the world, as the following quote from Mitchell Beer's article exposing the flaws in Canada's climate action strategy.
"Ranked among the worst-performing countries in CCPI 2020, Canada fell another three spots in this year's index, to 58th, Despite positive rhetoric from Canadian leaders, experts cite substantial discrepancies between the goals the government has set and the implementation of the policies necessary to achieve them."
https://below2c.org/2020/12/canada-falling-far-short-on-climate-policy-emissions-reduction-and-energy-transition/


Sources:

Saturday, 26 December 2020

BC's failure to embrace geothermal power plants must be influenced by fossil fuel company propaganda

Western Canada has extensive geothermal electric plant capacity that could, if exploited, power a great deal of the country. It is in the long run the cheapest source of electricity on the planet with the smallest environmental impact. It runs 24 hours a day 7 days a week pumping clean electricity in the grid with no pollution. 

These sustainable green power plants can be found in 24 countries in the world and none in Canada, even though we sit on a massive untapped capacity. In addition to this micro plants can be placed on the many exhausted oil wells in BC, Alberta, and Saskatchewan. These orphan wells are leaking dangerous amounts of methane into the atmosphere. Not only could we produce a constant flow of electricity from them but we could stop the methane leaks and the cost would be recovered through the sale of electricity. It would also bring a more reliable source of energy that hydro to more remote areas of the province, and much needed economic prosperity.

I would suggest the story here is the fossil fuel industry has spread so much misleading information about geothermal power plants, it has prevented this technology from being understood by the public and our politicians. Too often I have heard both Liberal and NDP MLAs buy this faceless propaganda. This is not the case in other countries. Kenya for example sees their geothermal power plants as their future, and it has already had a large positive impact on their quality of life. The US has 64 geothermal power plants, in one of these plants in Northern California the Geyser facility it produces 20% of California's power. 

British Columbia has fallen, I suspect, for fossil fuel propaganda and has failed to change BC Hydro’s mandate from building environmentally damaging, methane leaking and increasingly unstable dams toward clean safe geothermal power plants. They have also not rewritten the restrictive Liberal Governments legislation that has stopped the building of geothermal power plants and impeded the use of geothermal heating systems in our greenhouses. Instead, we are building gas pipelines and unstable dams, throwing our future away and any economic advantages that this sustainable free energy would give us. To make matters worse our Natural Gas resources, which at source leaks massive amounts of methane, contribute more to global warming than if we were burning coal. Yes, our Natural Gas is dirtier than coal because we don't adequately control the methane leaks, so it is not a transitional fuel. To make matters worse this gas is also used in the Tar Sands of Alberta to produce bitumen. 

Contrary to has been said by some politicians geothermal power plants do not pollute, nor do they do any damage if they are subjected to natural disasters or terrorist destruction (all that happens is water is released into the environment), the plants are more decentralized therefore more sustainable, they use existing technologies (steam generators and well-drilling expertise), they can be expanded unlike dams, and they have been constant use in for over 100 years around the world. 

I am tired of hearing politicians and the press say it is risky to build these plants, they overlook the fact that all oil wells have heat records so we know where the heat is located, so no risk. They also are fond of suggesting you have to have a good hot water source, which is also not true as modern plants (built in the ’60s) are now using closed-loop binary systems that use a liquid in the recirculating pipes that flash at a lower temperature of 57-degree centigrade. This means you do not need a hot zone nor water. These plants can be built anywhere in the world, including Northern and Eastern Canada.

In addition to this mineral extraction plants are attached to several geothermal electric plants throughout the world and they are extracting lithium and other minerals from the brine. This means no open-pit mines destroying the ecosystem or expensive mine shafts, or dangerous abandoned or poorly maintained tailing ponds.

In Iceland the free byproduct of their geothermal electrical plants is hot water, the water is freshwater from their streams heating during the electrical production process. This is pumped into their capital to provide their domestic hot water supply, heating for their buildings, their hot showers, systems to melt snow off their winter sidewalks, heat for their swimming pools, and even growing bananas in their greenhouses. You find similar uses in many US cities and other countries around the world. 


“Humanity already possesses the fundamental scientific, technical, and industry know-how to solve the carbon and climate problem. We are not dealing with a failure in technology, a failure in industry, a failure of human ability. We are dealing with a failure of social and political will." Nacala & Socolow 2004

Friday, 25 December 2020

California's Geothermal Power Plants - BC None???

The year 2019 found California producing 10,943 gigawatt-hours of energy in their 43  Geothermal Power Plants, and Nevada 33. These plants do not require complex machinery or large destruction of the environment and sit on the same volcanic zone that BC sits on. They have the smallest footprint of any renewable source of energy and use simple steam turbines and a few drilled wells to pump electricity into the grid. Creating the cheapest energy on the planet with the least environmental damage.

The reliability of this energy is like no other it is constant 24 hours a day 7 days a week and is far less likely to be damaged by a cyberattack, earthquakes, floods or other man-made or natural events. Any damage to the facility would only result in the release of hot water into the environment. 

The growth potential of this source of electricity is very easy to scale up once the first wells have been put into production. In California, they are now attaching mineral extraction facilities to geothermal electric plants that extract Lithium and other valuable minerals without the need to create destructive mines.

British Columbia has a massive capacity for Geothermal Power, as does Alberta and Saskatchewan. The BC government needs to shift  BC Hydro's mandate to the development of geothermal electrical power plants, it is the foundation of a strong sustainable future.  We are throwing our money away by investing in site C and Natural Gas pipelines. Geothermal power plants could create more energy than site C at a fraction of the cost.

We are being left behind as these geothermal electric plants are not only found in the US but also in El Salvador, Kenya, the Philippines, Iceland, New Zealand, Costa Rica, Turkey, Mexico, Japan, Nicaragua, Papua New Guinea, Portugal, China, Germany, France, Ethiopia, Austria, Australia and Thailand. We are being left behind and dependant on antiquated 19th-century technology such as dams and natural gas both leak methane into the atmosphere. Both causing extensive damage to the environment and contributing to climate change.

https://www.corporateknights.com/channels/mining/geothermal-power-plants-sustainable-mines-future-14283036/

https://www.corporateknights.com/channels/mining/geothermal-power-plants-sustainable-mines-future-14283036/


Source: https://archive.geothermal.org/Policy_Committee/Documents/2020/TN236021_20201218T112825_Geothermal%20Rising%20Comments%20-%20Geothermal%20Rising%20Comments%20on%20draft%20SB%20100%20Rep.pdf

Geothermal Power Plants Planned for Cornwall and Lithium

One-third of Cornwalls electrical needs are coming from renewable sources at the moment and it is likely that geothermal power plants will be able to eliminate more and more non-renewable sources of energy. The first project, the United Downs, will exploit the significant warm water resources found by the mining industry. Not only will it produce free renewable energy, but it will also be able to extract minerals from the water such as Lithium and other minerals that normally would have to be mined. The extraction of lithium adds to the economic gains the region will have from the development of Geothermal Power Plants, as well as better paying jobs and higher quality job gains for the region.

 Source: https://www.euractiv.com/section/energy/news/electricity-heat-and-lithium-geothermal-offers-new-hopes-for-old-mining-county/


The Wisdom of Wade Davis